I was thinking that as well, but the evictions above are 0 - but the bytes
used / available seem to indicate items are being evicted; Are evictions
incremented if items are expiring?

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Olga Khenkin <o...@metacafe.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> When memcached uses all allocated memory, it starts to delete old
> objects, which may not be expired yet. It deletes the least recently
> used object from the slab (bucket). These deletes are called
> 'evictions'.
>
> You can see the number of evictions in memcached 'stats' command. You
> can also use two other commands: 'stats slabs' and 'stats items', which
> will give you usage info per bucket.
>
> Olga.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: memcached@googlegroups.com [mailto:memcac...@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of tcbarrett
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:08 PM
> To: memcached
> Subject: Measuring Memory Usage
>
>
> Hi
>
> I searched the group for 'measuring memory usage' with no hits.
>
> I am trying to determine how much memory my cached data is using. I
> have some large data blocks that are not caching properly[1]. I am
> assuming that is due to there being a smaller numer of large 'buckets'
> and I have used all mine up?
>
> I am in the process of breaking it down into more sensible chunks
> (e.g. one data hash has 1000s of subkeys that I can make into cache
> hits on their own). However I would ideally like to know how much
> memory I am using as I have absolutely no idea if I am near the
> saturation point of allocated memory or not.
>
> I feel a bit dumb as this seems to be either a) common problem and I
> am incapable of finding the answer myself or b) a stupid problem that
> nobody ever thought someone would get into.
>
> This is running on a linux box (a few flavours), using perl.
>
> [1] By this I mean that sometimes, after a period of time, the cache
> retrieval is empty (before expiry). Basically I don't know why. Could
> it be some other application eating the memory? Or is it other large
> keys being set, pushing it out? Or am I using up all the allocated
> memory?
>

Reply via email to