Hi On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Henrik Schröder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly, which is why the solution to avoiding cache synchronization errors > is to simply not implement failover. In my client, I use the ketama method > for server selection, but if a server fails, I just mark it as dead, and > keep retrying it with a growing interval. As long as it's dead, all requests > that would end up on that server simply misses. > Then your implementation doesn't remapping points to close server ? But that is the best of ketama implementation !, remapping only a keys affected. If this is true you can use a more easy client side hash approximation avoiding failover scheme ;) -- --pau
