> Hi! > > On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:39 PM, dormando wrote: > > > I don't fundamentally disagree, but what specifically does doing this fix? > > From a user/developer's standpoint it adds another place to look for > > documentation? > > Wider audience of people can update it, make it more understandable, etc. > > We have way too little documentation right now... anything that gets it out > there is good (and anything that allows more people to use it... awesome).
I know it always seems like I'm pooing on good ideas, but we used to have an open wiki and that didn't work out so great. I'm all for having a wikipedia page much improved over what's there now - specifically linking to our own documentation... Which would increase visibility. It's presently trivial to edit our existing wiki. Promoting another source might just sprout up another ... section of docs? Now have two places to track changes for folks following? Well we presently have two. I like the idea of moving them out of the source tree and into the wiki. Moving them out of the source tree and into wikipedia puts us back at two again. Have there been specific complaints about it being difficult to get information into the wiki? Or find it? -Dormando
