I wish I knew. Perhaps we'll get a better release out for windows soon
enough...

On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Sean wrote:

> I am getting it from membase:
> http://blog.elijaa.org/index.php?post/2010/08/25/Memcached-1.4.5-for-Windows
>
> I also tried build it myself using mingw. It turns out with the same
> error.
>
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2:46 pm, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> wrote:
> > I don't think anyone knows why that particular port of memcached has
> > trouble; I'm assuming it's a buggy libevent, or buggy interaction with
> > libevent. Given that it's an unhandled socket error :P
> >
> > Where did you get the windows binary from?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> > > =] can you use 1.2.1 without problems? use it ehheeheh
> > > i don't know if you will get more speed with newer version
> > > if you don't know, please continue trying in this mail list. i can't
> > > help with windows :(
> >
> > > 2011/2/8 Sean <sean.y....@gmail.com>:
> > > > I am using only one telnet to test the memcache. So only one client
> > > > and 0 keys. On the same machine, if I run memcached.exe version 1.2.1,
> > > > it works fine.
> >
> > > > On Feb 8, 2:02�pm, Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br> wrote:
> > > >> i don't know, but can memcache use windows pipes?
> > > >> shared memory protocol?
> > > >> for loop back (127.0.0.1) arp table have always 1 register (internal
> > > >> on arp engine, or inside arp table), i think that's not a arp problem
> > > >> too...
> > > >> maybe windows virtual memory problem?
> > > >> what's your today app size?
> > > >> how many clients at same time?
> > > >> how many keys?
> > > >> what's the average key length?
> >
> > > >> 2011/2/8 �<memcac...@googlecode.com>:
> >
> > > >> > Comment #9 on issue 122 by sean.y....@gmail.com: failed to write, 
> > > >> > and not
> > > >> > due blocking: No error
> > > >> >http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=122
> >
> > > >> > I don't think it's related to ARP either, since I am using the 
> > > >> > loopback
> > > >> > interface 127.0.0.1. The arp table is not full. I can stably repro 
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > issue on a few machines right after I start the memcache.exe. On 
> > > >> > some other
> > > >> > machines, it works fine though. I can't figure out the differences 
> > > >> > between
> > > >> > these machines. They are of the same Windows version with all last 
> > > >> > patches.
> >
> > > >> --
> > > >> Roberto Spadim
> > > >> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
> >
> > > --
> > > Roberto Spadim
> > > Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>

Reply via email to