On Feb 28, 2011 5:04 PM, "Trond Norbye" <trond.nor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have any huge objections to this patch, but I'd rather change the logic so instead of specifying the number of ports and have them in a range I'd prefer if we used multiple -h hostname:port and -U hostname:port. That would allow you to bind to multiple specific interfaces and multiple port numbers.. ex: -h *:11211 -h *:11212 -h *:11213 etc
this sounds excellent! -- awl
