> Hi Matt, I think it is my fault did not explain my motivation > clearly. I am not the one who has the power to > tear Spymemcached up. Spymemcached helps me a lot , I love Spymemcahced. I > just want to share some thing which is valuable. > Thank you for your reply. You must be a loyal user of > Spymemcached. I understood you completely. Since it was a open-source > project, I have my right to suggest and improve it. > One thing is true, I use my client to store 100000 keys in > memcached , and it runs well . For spymecahced it failed. > "I can say with a bit of experience, dealing with all of the > possible connection issues takes some effort." For god's sake, > as a will-be member of IT , I have to say we were born to solve the > problems. I solved a problem, I wanted to share with people. I > thought it could help someone out of trouble. > Now you are saying a great number of people use Spymemcached > quite successfully. People have the right to choose what they > love, you can not stop them. You never can. > Thanks Matt, you gave me a idea about my client's future. I am > looking forward to your reply.
I don't think he meant that you should go fix spymemcached, I think he meant you should've sent a bug report to their mailing list to see if they can fix it before hauling off and writing your own client. He's not a "loyal user", he's one of the authors. -Dormando
