> > El 17/01/12 21:27, dormando escribió:
> >
> > > > could you please try 1.4.11 with the attached patch on all platforms? 
> > > > I'm
> > > > taking a bit of a guess since google isn't very familiar with this 
> > > > macro.
> > > >
> > > > for bonus points; add an fprintf(stderr, etc) to make sure it's using 
> > > > the
> > > > right path for each.
> >
> > Hello @dormando:
> >
> > Results after applying your patch to memcached 1.4.11 on different RHEL
> > versions:
> >
> > - RHEL-4 (gcc 3.4.6) can be compiled without problems on both i386 and 
> > x86_64,
> > thanks! :)
> >
> > - RHEL-5 (gcc 4.1.2) can't built on both i386 + x86_64, with a new error:
> >
> >     https://gist.github.com/1632081
> >
> > - RHEL-6 (gcc 4.4.6):
> >
> >     a) x86_64 = build without problems
> >
> >     b) i386 = "manual" compilation works, but a I'm getting an error 
> > building
> > the RPM package, it might be related with gcc flags, I'm working on it..
> > rpmbuild error output:
> >
> >     https://gist.github.com/1632139
>
> Closer... Can you try the attached patch against 1.4.11? could've sworn
> I'd tested the other path, but I guess not :(
>
> I added some prints at the bottom that should print something to STDERR
> when started in the foreground:
>
> $ ./memcached
> USING GCC ATOMICS
>
> Any chance you could give me the output from each of your platforms as
> well as the build test results? I'm a little worried that rhel-6 i386
> should be using real atomics, but I haven't figured that out for sure yet.

Also, are you running 'make test' on these platforms? I'm curious if 'make
test' actually passes on all of the 32bit machines.

Reply via email to