> > This is still a cache you're talking about? > > If I use the definition that I used in my last memcached talk, no. I just > really want something as easy to use as memcached to store key/values that can > replicate and survive a node failure without data loss or loss of service and > is not controlled by a company. A guy can dream right? =)
No basho, no 10gen...... did cassandra ever start working? Oh no that's another company... I think... I think people trivialize how hard it is to write a persistent storage system. InnoDB is awful hard to beat.