Comment #16 on issue 192 by brianlm...@gmail.com: Crash when sending specially crafted packet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=192

I am in firm defense of dormando on this one. If people would actually contribute a good patch with tests, this likely could have been closed long ago.

The reality is, this is only an issue for people stupid enough to have your memcached listening on a public network. Otherwise, how is someone malicious going to send that packet to my memcached? Secondly, it segfaults. That can cause a DOS. If your infrastructure has memcached on a public port AND also relies on it so much that your arch falls because memcached is restarted, you have bigger issues in your arch and need to rethink a lot of things.

And yes, he didn't create memcached. He has however been the only person doing any real work on a daemon that powers thousands of web applications world wide for several years now. The person that made it has moved on to Google and the other people that were putting a lot of work into it are doing their own noSQL memcached in the cloud kind of database thing.

So, kudos to Dormando for giving this bug all the attention it deserves.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--

--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to