Comment #10 on issue 360 by erichase...@gmail.com: Alignment check on in
configure.ac is broken and results in addition memcpy()s
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=360
Yes, I believe scope of change would be isolated to the binary protocol.
Anyway, same results with vanilla 1.4.18. However, binary(-get).t seems to
complete in both instances. I'll run & attach `prove' results this evening.
Is there a test case for multiget & multiset? In my opinion NEED_ALIGN is
completely safe, so I'm little hesitant of introducing a false-positive.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
