You might want to look at alternatives in that kind of setup. For example, BerkeleyDB is quite a bit faster than memcached when your cache is just on one local system. The advantages of memcached come into play when you have a large cache across multiple machines.
- Perrin On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Hans Kramer <jlam.kra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using memcached on a system with very modest RAM: 64Mb to be precise > (an Artila Matrix 504). > I have specified -M 1 -t 1 to reduce the memory allocated by memcached. > Now RSS is always modest and around an explainable value, however, VSZ is > at least 20Mb and with every > thread I add VSZ increases with at least 6 Mbytes. If I understand this > correctly, this relative "high" VSZ, increases the oom_score > a lot. Hence I would like to reduce unnecessary alloc as much as possible. > I have briefly looked at the memcached source and I cannot any significant > mallocs. Is this perhaps coming from the libevent > library? > > Any insights will be helpful. > > Kind regards > > Hans > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
