Convinced me ;-) thanks,
On 8/30/07, dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Khamis Siksek wrote: > > 10 rows is just an example, but replacing 1 MB for 100 bytes change > > every time there is an update the overhead is more than 99%. > > > > How about using the same methodology that xdelta is using to do the > > binary patching, also the client doesn't have to know anything about the > > offset, he just need to call a function "Update" with the right key, the > > server should handle the patching not the client. > > If you're sending the whole dataset to the server, it's no more overhead > to copy over the data. It'd be a lot more computationally intensive to > do an xdelta on what to copy around in RAM. Also, 1MB is the upper limit > for slabs, so they shouldn't get much bigger than that :) > > -Dormando > -- Khamis Siksek http://saksoook.blogspot.com
