On 9/29/07, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Chu wrote: > > > Memcachedb uses Berkeley DB as a storing > > backend, so lots of features including transaction and replication are > > supported. > > Is Berkeley DB considered reliable these days? Any other db alternative, I mean reliable and high performance of read and write? Can you make some suggestion? We also need replication feature that Berkeley DB supports.
> I've had problems with > it in the past, particularly when values were replaced with larger sizes > for existing keys, and I believe the subversion project moved away from > it as the default data store. > > -- > Les Mikesell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Steve Chu http://stvchu.org
