On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 12:54:04 -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote: > I think you're confusing ``broken'' with ``I can imagine something > you can't do.''
Hmm, perhaps you are right. I indeed don't need the things I talk about right now, but I thought it would be nice to have the way to have them later. And if binary protocol will co-exist with the text one, it always will be possible to implement the next version of it. Thanks for clarification! -- Tomash Brechko
