On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:44:40 -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote: > If I ask for [a, b, c, d], and I get back [c, d], then at the point > where I got c, I know I'm not going to get a or b. My client doesn't > currently optimize for that case, but it certainly could if it > mattered. If I designed for an array of pairs, I could just as easily > do the same thing.
You can do that _comparing_ the keys or key ids, while I propose only counting the results. Or is it an indirect arguing again? ;) > You'd be free to use get and get explicit NAKs if you wanted to, > though. But I will use TCP_CORK advantage of getq then. You simply refusing to see the point. -- Tomash Brechko
