Git does have that same capability. I have seen a lot of initial support for mercurial but i'm seeing a increased amount of mercurial -> git movement in the last months as well. Git now ships with a hg2git converter in its contrib directory for this reason.
On Feb 9, 2008 11:16 AM, Brian Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Feb 9, 2008, at 12:28 AM, dormando wrote: > > > Mercurial does appear to work better with pushing things around, while > > git is primarily pull oriented. I don't mind the loss there, pushing > > between distributed repos is kinda crazy. Or maybe I just haven't used > > hg enough. > > > This is what is really working well for me with Mercurial. I dropped > hgweb into a directory and then as I want to add users I just update > an htpasswd generated file. No fuss what so ever. We all push into the > same repository. As far as sharing changes go I like that I can push a > branch into the main repository and share that branch, without any > average committer/puller seeing that (well by default... its not > hidden). > > I am sure git has much of this as well though. > > > Cheers, > -Brian > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org > Seattle, Washington > http://krow.net/ <-- Me > http://tangent.org/ <-- Software > http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun > _______________________________________________________ > You can't grep a dead tree. > > > -- Tobi http://shopify.com - modern e-commerce software http://typo.leetsoft.com - Open source weblog engine http://blog.leetsoft.com - Technical weblog
