Hi Tormod, Could you please tell the parameter name in the Registry settings for memory and ports.It would be very helpful. I am not finding any parameter name, that goes with memory and ports.
Regards, Tinkku. On 3/3/08, Tormod Hystad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I set up new Win32 memcached instances I install them as a service > using the "-d install" switch. Then stop the service and edit the > registry settings (HKLM/System/CurrentControlSet/Services/Memcached) for > that service to change the parameters (memory, ip, ports and so on) and > then start the service again. Works great. > > Slightly on-topic: Any news of a more updated Win32 build publicly > available? I saw some messages about someone having a go at building > 1.2.4 + libevent 1.4 for Win32 around Christmas, haven't seen anything > since. > > One of the devs here spent some hours the other night and built > memcached 1.2.4 with libevent 1.3e for Win32. Any known problems with > that setup? We're deploying it to our test environment tomorrow and if > it works out OK we'll deloy it to production at the end of the week. I > guess we could make the binaries available to the public, if there is > interest. > > > - Tormod, > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:memcached- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tinkku J.P > > Sent: 29. februar 2008 18:32 > > To: Jehiah Czebotar > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Allocation Memory to memcached 1.2.1 for Win32 > > > > jehiah > > As you concluded, it seems only default memory is getting allocated, > > bcoz when i trying storing beyond certain limit(nearly 11000) , it > > clears of the old record for storing the new one. > > Could you also please advice on any installation procedures for > > "memcached for Windows" that need to be taken care for fixing this. > > > > Tinkku > > > > On 2/29/08, Jehiah Czebotar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it might be helpful for you to describe if > > > > > > a) you are describing that it starts with only 64mb of memory > > > > > > or > > > > > > b) it never grows beyond 64mb even when the cache is filled. > > > > > > the former might be correct, the later would probably not. > > > > > > -- > > > Jehiah > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tinkku J.P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Hi , > > > > I installed the memcached 1.2.1 for Win32 on my Windows XP > machine. > > > > > > > > But it seems it is taking default memory space of 64MB for > storage.I > > > > tried uninstalling and installing back by allocating more space > to > > > > memcache, But still it takes the default memory space. I tried > > > > installing nearly 20 times. I got it right once, having allocated > > more > > > > memory. But again i tried uninstalling and installing, i am not > > > > getting it right. > > > > Could you please advice on how to allocate memory to memcache and > > > > whether there are any new memcache intallable for Windows, than > > > > memcached 1.2.1 for Win32? > > > > > > > > Tinkku > > > > > > > >
