On Mar 18, 2008, at 21:29, Ray Krueger wrote:
An overload that allowed passing a timeout would probably suffice. Or an asyncIncr that returned a future :)
Yeah, I don't like not having an asyncIncr, but it's way more complicated than an async set so I haven't got to it.
Good point, though, I should have a bug filed for that just as a reminder, or perhaps and invitation for someone else to come around and do it. :)
-- Dustin Sallings
