Well that's what I was expecting, but from my tests I was getting that
it (Cache::Memcached::libmemcached) was slightly slower (or at least
roughly the same; but certainly not an order of magnitude faster!).
But at least it seems to work correctly, and we're going to trial it as
a drop-in replacement for Cache::Memcached. Hopefully our problems will
go away and we might even see that 4 to 10x performance gain.
But any ideas on why my incrs might be failing?
-Andrew
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:37:34PM -0400, Andrew Bryan wrote:
I tried this exact same test with Cache::Memcached::libmemcached, and did
not get this behavior (maybe just because it is slower?).
By "it is slower" I presume you mean "Cache::Memcached is slower".
(Cache::Memcached::libmemcached is approx 4 to 10 times faster.)
Tim.
