Sorry, I performed some clean tests and figured out that there is no
difference. Both clients work the same in terms of the object size.
--
Alexander Zaitsev
AMG Lab Sarl
Dustin Sallings wrote:
I can't imagine what this test does. Can you post code?
Our serialization is pretty much the same (there are only so many
ways to do it), but my default compression threshold is lower. You
could be falling into a different slab and pushing out the other objects.
But really, I can't imagine what your test is actually doing. I can
think of countless ways to not store a lot of data, but if you think
there's a bug here, I'm going to need your test to reproduce it
because in all of my tests, I can retrieve everything I store.
