Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2008-06-11 16:16:31 +0200, Mattias Karlsson wrote: >> The file "doc/protocol.txt" says: >> >> bytes 64u Current number of bytes used by this server to >> store items >> limit_maxbytes 32u Number of bytes this server is allowed to use for >> storage. >> >> So my question is: how can 'bytes' be larger than 'limit_maxbytes' ? > > On a related note: Shouldn't limit_maxbytes be a 64u, too? 4 Gigs of RAM > isn't that much any more, and conceptionally, "bytes" and > "limit_maxbytes" should be the same type, IMHO. > > hp
Weird! I hadn't noticed that. 'maxbytes' is actually a size_t, which will be 64-bit on a 64-bit OS, but 32-bit on a 32-bit OS, etc. So it's fine as is, but the documentation is weird. Should we say 32u/64u? :) -Dormando
