<<A Better Approach?>>
Not the US. A real critique wouldn't be allowed by the religious folks; stealth creationist science teachers would just provide a lame critique. Ideally, creationism would be analyzed claim by claim and shown why it was 1) wrong, 2) incoherent, or 3) vacuous. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
