"...they didn't put her on the spot and ask for specifics nearly enough." - BC
Again, this was the 'crime' of the situation. The two parties signed up for the 'debate' agreeing upon a contract that they refused to share with the voters. We don't know the 'rules' they agreed upon, but whatever you saw was no accident, for sure! I did enjoy seeing a couple of other VPs debate this morning on Democracy Now! On Oct 3, 10:38 am, BC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 3, 10:33 am, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It wasn't a slaughter. Palin did as good a job as possible for having > > little knowledge or experience. She only babbled on two questions 1) > > global warming, and 2) whether the vp had legislative powers as well > > as executive powers. > > > For a number of the other questions, she simply didn't answer them. > > Agreed. She spoke (American) English and constructed relatively > complete sentences, so her performance can be considered somewhat of a > success with such low expectations going in. But they didn't put her > on the spot and ask for specifics nearly enough. I still thought > Biden came out ahead, though he did get a bit repetitive. > -BC- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
