oh...that would be 220,000 plus the thousands that died later for radiation so what about 300,000
On Oct 5, 5:47 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "...we already survived a couple of small hydrogen explosions ..." - > Jason > > Perhaps I missed these. When did this happen? > > On Oct 5, 2:46 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > a full global on nuclear stick yes. however, concentrated strikes > > that wipe out a few major cities might not have the nuclear fall out. > > we already survived a couple of small hydrogen explosions that wiped > > out a few hundred thousand humans (count initial strikes and the death > > via radiation). hungry (starving) people who are at war get > > irrational too. > > > On Oct 5, 4:16 pm, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > <<resource competition factors (food/oil/clean water that may occur) > > > that will likely lead to war. >> > > > > I have a hard time seeing resource competition leading to nuclear > > > war: such a war would destroy the resources desired.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
