So, your philosophy is that marriage is a biologically defined thing for procreation? If so, ‘tis a strange albeit common view.
On Oct 12, 8:19 am, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/nyregion/12marriage.html?em --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
