The practicing scientist that I know are not out, and they admit so, to show proof...if that is what is meant by "truth" in that link. They say they are trying to show a link, a high probabiliy, the possible cause, etc. or to rule out a certain cause that we think might be a cause. Not to give a difinate "truth" answer. In other words, they are not dogmatic.
stemcell On Oct 27, 12:49 am, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. But Popper? > > stemcell > > On Oct 27, 12:16 am, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > <<I came across a very interesting essay by a scientist, to which > > I will provide a link>> > > > Most people who go to great lengths to point out limits of science > > (real or imagined) are usually doing so in order to remove obstacles > > to your believing in their brand of woo. > > > I see nothing on the site about who "Dr. Terry Halwes" is or what his > > credentials are. That normally means a medical doctor or dentist, at > > best, but more likely a Ph.D. in theology or some other pseudo > > science. In other words, not a scientist.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
