*NO, IT"S YOU!!!* don't anybody tell him, let him figure it out...it's not important really. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:17 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Clogtowner is Lana.* > ** > *J.* > > In a message dated 10/28/2008 2:04:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Hi y'all - I can vouch for the fact that Xcurtsy is not Lana > > On Oct 28, 12:49 pm, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not Lana. > > > > blowyourself StemCell! > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > *I believe that the technical term for Blowselfus is autofellatio.* > > > *J.* > > > > > OK Crotchblow. How 'bout Crotchus de Blowselfus? Would that work? > > > > > stemcell > > > > > On Oct 28, 11:12 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm warning you two firestarters! I will start posting under another > name > > > > again... > > > > > > you'd better "*THINK "*about the consequences buddy! I know other > ways to > > > > get even...wroohahahahah! > > > > > > [?] > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi y'all - I think Crotchbow is appealing. I don't agree with the > > > > > article posted by Aaron. The CFA definition is fine with me. Of > > > > > course, if we accept a theist as being a true believer and not just > > > > > someone who attends church for social reasons etc. then they are > not > > > > > practicing freethought as their faith is illogical (Mr. Spock > episode > > > > > 284 11/2/84.) I do agree with the article in respect to all > atheists > > > > > not being freethinkers - some are just too lazy to think. > > > > > Nevertheless, I feel that Freethinker is a good umbrella term, and > as > > > > > pointed out, is unrestrictive versus confining. > > > > > > > On Oct 27, 3:37 pm, stem cell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I think Crotchblow has a point. In the early days we went > through > > > > > > this. But before I go any further, I would like to ask Aaron > what > > > > > > prompted you to post that link? Are you considering that it > would be > > > > > > an idea to consider changing the name of MFA? It is the name. > It is > > > > > > inclusive. It is inviting (I think). Why should MFA change the > name > > > > > > just to bow down to certain groups who feel it is offensive. I > am > > > > > > getting to far along in thought so I'll just wait till I hear > your > > > > > > response to those previous questions. > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > stemcell > > > > > > > > On Oct 27, 1:47 pm, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is about ownership of a definition as an organization. WE > can > > > > > > > either show ownership and give this word a bent in respect to > the > > > > > > > organizations mission, or we can leave it as an open-ended > > > question, > > > > > > > thereby allowing any existing and future members to give it > thier > > > own > > > > > > > personal meaning without holding them captive to it. > > > > > > > > > Well and so, if you have a concrete mission you should have a > > > concrete > > > > > > > bent to brand the whole to be easily identified...Replace the > > > > > > > organizational name with any other representation wording and > what > > > do > > > > > > > you get? Memphis Freethough Alliance...Memphis Secular > Alliance? > > > > > > > Memphis Skeptic Alliance? Who is your target member? > > > > > > > > > FREE - unrestricted vs. captive? > > > > > > > THINKING - not something encouraged by any diety or theism I > know > > > > > > > of.... > > > > > > > > > It works for my framework and perceptions limited though they > are. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 27, 12:50 pm, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It was probably a mistake for me to post the first paragraph > of > > > > > > > > Lowder's essay or to offer a summary. It's too easy (and > > > perfectly > > > > > > > > natural) for people to respond to my blurb rather than to the > > > essay > > > > > > > > itself. I'm always happy to hear what my fellow freethinkers > > > think, > > > > > > > > but I am especially interested in your review of the specific > > > ideas > > > > > > > > expressed in the essay and how they might impact MFA. > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/features/2000/lowder1.html > > > > > > > > > > Aaron- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > 1B2.gif > > > > < 1KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > >http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001<http://www.games.com/?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001> > <http://www.games.com/?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001>"> > > > check it out!- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001<http://www.games.com/?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001>"> > check it out! > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
