Hi y'all - I tend to agree (what's new?) If I were presented with evidence of the supernatural, my first thought would be a malfunction in myself, or some kind of trickery. Nevertheless, I would examine the evidence and I'd be very happy to find a god who would guarantee eternal bliss for me if I just believe in him and perhaps lick a small part of one of his feet. That seems like a fair trade.
On Oct 29, 10:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Though I call myself a freethinker I may no longer actually be a > freethinker. I have been so completely atheist for so long that if I were > presented > with conclusive evidence of the existence of a god I would not likely accept > it. > I would find it to be more likely that someone had dropped LSD in my beer > or that I had developed a severe brain chemical imbalance or something. That > would be far more likely than proof of a supernatural god. I think Aaron is > a freethinker because he seems open to new evidence. I think I have become > about as closed minded as the xians. I clearly was a freethinker and I did > arrive at my conclusions as a freethinker but now that they are conclusions I > don't know that I can truly call myself a freethinker. What do you all > think? > > J. > **************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot > 5 Travel Deals! > (http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
