Hi y'all - the machine that I voted on a couple of weeks ago was more primitive than an amstrad comupter that I owned in the late 70s. As I have no paper print out - even an ATM machine can do that - I have no proof of vote. In UK ( don't know if this is still the case) a paper ballot was used. There were simply the names of the candidates, and an X was required next to the chosen one. The procedure took less than 30 seconds and I don't remember ever standing in line. Of course, the count took several hours, but there was a paper trail. I don't remember any questioning of the results on the lines of the Florida debacle - all it took was a recount with more witnesses. I think the desire for instant results if fuelling the problem.
On Oct 31, 12:48 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.brasschecktv.com:80/page/465.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
