Sounds pretty "Thorny" to me. J. BBDD, Several freethinker groups have been exposed to bigotry in the past and some of us are very sensitive to the possibility of it. This smells like a trap to some of us and when you have been on this site longer you will realize that. Maybe all knowledge is not worth having? at what price?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:44 AM, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: What is with the choice? It is strange to encounter such bigotries in a group supposedly dedicated to free thought. To a bigot it means one thing. To a friend I call out, "MY NIGGAH!", to it means quite another. The site is so named to test those who PRETEND to be free thinkers. Niggerwise is that highest of wisdoms; the wisdom won through oppression. It is best you not click on it. You no doubt are more comfortable in the most narrow view affordable in this day and age. Knowledge by any name never hurt a truly free mind. _http://niggerwise.com_ (http://niggerwise.com/) On Nov 3, 7:11 am, "Liz Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > What's with the below title? Seems a strange choice for a web address name. > I would have a hard time posting something like that unless I were > illustrating some point. What gives? > > Liz > > _http://niggerwise.com/_ (http://niggerwise.com/) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[email protected]) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[email protected]) ] On Behalf Of BBDD > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 4:57 AM > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance > Subject: Re: Hidden Cameras on Private Property > > Actually, no you do not. Who ever advised you that was the case is > entirely incorrect. It is not the case with ordinary photography > unless sold as a professional shot. You can do with it whatever you > wish... when the money rolls in the issue arises. Not until. Then the > right to the model is only to some reasonable portion of that profit. > Even that is usually superseded by the publics right to know. If you > have fame, you lose the right and become fare game ~ paparazzi creed. > > More especially, it most certainly is not the case with any "crafted" > painting. Then, even after profit there is no such requirement under > law. > > _http://niggerwise.com_ (http://niggerwise.com/) > > On Oct 31, 10:51 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > When I do portraits, whether paint or photo, I have to get a model > release, > > NO matter where, when, or who. Because of the child pornography problem, > > there may be big trouble with anything child related IF the parent wants > to > > make it an issue.... > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jason (Memphis) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > wrote: > > > > If a fundamentalist Christian recorded on video/audio statements at > > > one of our freethought meetings without our consent and then sent > > > those videos to various employers of MFA members who had known > > > Christian fundamentalist bosses, would that be a legal, ethical issue > > > or both? Would the fundamentalist be breaking the law by recording > > > someone on video without their consent? What if minors at our meeting > > > were also filmed?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - **************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol?redir=http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
