LOLOLOL! you call that graphics hack job art? I am not on drugs either...what you been smokin?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:16 PM, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are not an artist or you would understand. Escher is a great > example of mystical transcendence, but not conscious cultural control. > There is original art, of course, but it is comprehensible to an > artist, not a layman. We, in the business have an eye for it. The > laymen is the canvas that eye beholds. Your career? How sad for you. > It is obvious that if you do not see the significant differences > between the transcendent Escher and the masterful Dali, you have made > a very limiting career choice. Kid, I am a professional artist with > work in collections around the world and in one Presidential > collection. Been there. Been proven. > > They are not baboons any more than my logo is a peacock. They are > mandrills (mandrill means, "colorful man"). My logo is not a peacock. > It is Malek Taus, icon of the arts. I am sure you can manage a still > life, but you certainly lack insight into imagery enough to comprehend > either Dali or Escher… and therefore, certainly not my work. > > Are you the wanna be that thought one needs a release to paint a > likeness????? > > http://niggerwise.com > > > > On Nov 3, 12:57 pm, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Visited your site to be fair. It gave me a headache, and If I ever > dropped > > LSD, I think that is what I would see. Not that Lucy is a bad thing for > > everyone, just not for me. Yes, surreal....Yes, provocative, and Baboons > > give me the willies. As as artistic creation is my career, I would not > > compare the sites elements to Salvador Dali except for possibly the > attempt > > to twist the viewer, but your end result was most confusing. Why with > your > > stated expertise did you not use Escher instead? Too concrete? Not > ephemeral > > enough? Also, I am confused as there is no known original art, just > > successive perspectives of what has gone before. We can only reinterpret > > possibly with newer media but content... > > > > Why the insults? we could have some serious discussion here as I see you > > have continued to post repeatedly. What cult issues have you dealt with? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I happen to be one of those Californians, Jason. Not new age, but that > > > other camp. I am an inventor and expert in robotics systems. I am also > > > a consultant on cult issues and have effectively countered them very > > > likely longer than you have been alive (based on the evident > > > immaturity of your posts). All of the work of my sites is entirely > > > original, both visual and sound, and as mystical as, say, the work of > > > Salvador Dali. I have many years at this and am far more effective at > > > combating religion than you can ever dream of being. Still, I have a > > > respect and working knowledge of the occultism that both Dali and > > > Einstein shared ~ the root of genius ~ the right working of mind. > > > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:44 am, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > BBDD, > > > > > > I never had an issue opening your webpages. I actually found them > > > > quite entertaining--a childish wonderland of wishfulness and devout > > > > New Age religious mysticism. You remind me of many of my devout New > > > > Ager friends that I know from California (or some--not all--of the > > > > people I know from Portland). > > > > > > Just a FYI for others: BBDD types are very typical in California and > > > > so are religious Christian fundamentalists. However, there also is a > > > > large contingency of atheists, scientists, and secularists that seems > > > > to keep the New Age mystics of the "mind" (aka, BBDD) and other > > > > religous fundatmentalists in check. > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:10 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well now, this is rather amusing. I thought this was a group for > free > > > > > thinkers, not the religiously clogged. No, a domain site will not > by > > > > > itself crash Internet Explorer, kids. Can't happen. All servers > must > > > > > be certified and my sites are on the best. Even the worst will not > do > > > > > more than generate an error if there is a problem. Sites are > written > > > > > in Java or css/html. Nothing in either that can come close to > > > > > interfering with a browser. Some browsers handle the code better > than > > > > > others but that effects only how well the site displays. That > > > > > establishes that you are not a group that thinks much about the > most > > > > > powerful tool available to any cause ~ the web. > > > > > > > Then there is this silly notion that if one clicks on a domain name > > > > > one of us niggers will actually jump out and get you. Well, I knew > you > > > > > was South ~ but that is somewhere south of Cuba. > > > > > > > That one very much establishes that at least those with that issue > are > > > > > very far from free thinkers. Remind me more of the nut cases with > the > > > > > Fred Felps church than thinkers at all. > > > > > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > > > > > LOOK OUT! we gonna getcha.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
