Not to nit pick, but Newton was not knowledgeable of QBL, while knowledgeable of related work. There is no reason to think Shakespeare had any knowledge. That is based on a very weak legend the Shakespeare and Francis Bacon were one and the same person. Bacon did have in depth knowledge. The legend is purposeful and meant to demonstrate that genius has a separate embodiment beyond the individual. However they were most certainly not the same individual and Shakespeare unlikely had anymore than fleeting knowledge. Di Vinci, on the other hand, was stone cold into it.
http://niggerwise.com On Nov 6, 9:31 am, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BBDD, > > it sounds to me like you are able to write meaningfully about QBL. > However, I am wondering why you are so quick to proclaim your > expertise to in this discussion group. I have good reason to believe, > both from experience, observation and reading that when one starts to > manipulate their mind with QBL and other similar tools, it is common > for them to be fooled into thinking that they are far more advanced > than they really are. That doesn't mean that I know that you are a > mere dabbler, but I will not be easily convinced that you are possible > expert like Newton, Shakespeare, Elias Ashmole and other great men > seem to have been. I would like to give you another friendly warning > that you may have heard before. Please do not take this to mean that I > think that you are crazy, I don't, but as you have probably bean > warned it is easy enough to mess up your mind with QBL. My advice is > to proceed slowly. QBL is a powerful tool, but it is not without it's > dangers and limitations. > > On Nov 6, 5:37 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Centers are quite obvious and living in them is just as obvious with a > > little free thought. Motive center is easily recognized. It is that > > portion of mind we think in quickly enough to apply the brakes in an > > emergency. Emotive center is that one which gets us in the most > > trouble by causing us to act on emotion before fully considering > > consequences. Cogent center is the portion of mind that does consider, > > but it also "identifies" and considers far more than is essential to > > any endeavor. Pneuma is that part of mind that handles conceptualizing > > and dreaming ~ sometime way too heavy on the dreaming. > > > An example of living in a center would be the bookkeeper type that > > lives less adventure and is unable to dare emotionally. Another would > > be the athlete with an aversion to poetry and sensitivity. Our > > greatest strength is in living in and balancing all centers of mind. > > There is a method for doing so. The period most noted for the wide use > > of such methods is the Renaissance. These methods saw another period > > of popularity during the Industrial Revolution. > > >http://niggerwise.com > > > On Nov 6, 4:14 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Generally, centers exist in us. When we narrow our selves down and > > > gain stewardship over the legions of self, we begin to exist in > > > centers. This occurs as we master. The master athlete lives in motive > > > center. The master thespian lives in emotive center. The master > > > industrialist lives in cogent center. The master poet lives in pneuma > > > center. Each lives one life per domain or center… ideally. > > > > Now, of course this is not so clear cut and “ideal” in practice. The > > > master dancer lives in motive and emotive centers. The master artist > > > must live in all four. The more domains you have life in, the more you > > > live. This principle allows one to increase time within a given time. > > > > One might think of this as adding strands to the necklace of life. > > > There is another more commonly understood method of increasing time > > > within given time. This is to essentially add beads to each strand. > > > The more you know and dare, the more you live. Many strive to be one > > > thing in life limiting quantity of life. It is better to be all things > > > that present themselves, thus increasing life. Adding strands > > > increases the quality of life. Adding beads increases the quantity of > > > life. Doing either increases the span of life across given time. > > > >http://niggerwise.com-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
