The serious mistake that Isparklaria makes is assuming that these freaks are speaking of QBL, when in fact one needs QBL to comprehend what they are speaking of.
http://niggerwise.com On Nov 7, 3:05 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the previous thread I end up mentioning an involvement in Thelema. > Thelema is renegade. I am a renegade's renegade. I disavow all of the > brotherhoods ~ including those that recognize myself. This is due my > aversion to labeling in part. I also take issue with the view of many > of my brethren in Thelema. Thelema is based on a book of supposed > super psychological revelation, Liber Al vel Legis. Many Thelemites > assume it addresses a new social order. My position is that it > addresses a new ordering of internal self. > > On Magick: Most of what Isparklaria is saying of kabbalah is not QBL, > but Crowley’s particular take on Magick. His version is a combination > of systems of mind. While flawed, it is a darn good read, especially > if a first or second (preferably second) edition of The Equinox > series. While I do have the entire Equinox series on my site, provided > by the OTO, it is important to partake such work in the proper > decanter. Everything about these early editions are a treasure, from > color plates to the very fine binding. To collectors, they are as > sought after as the Mandrake Press books. Such publishing is not just > a collection of writing. It is a work of art in its entirety. The set > of concepts, the art (including the wonderful and rare work of the > greater than Crowley wizard, Spare), the binding, even the strange > collection of concepts ~ all are to be taken in their entirety as a > single work. This is the inspiration for my approach to sites. > > The Kenneths and I understood this and carry it over into our own art. > That moron, Anton, steals a few of the zanier concepts and calls it > wisdom, producing something totally void of wisdom or, more > importantly, art. How do you know if you understand any of what can > even be considered wisdom in The Equinox??? That is easy. One brushes > aside the flamboyant Crowley and understands the greater work of one > who defied him and yet one of the few Crowley always respected ~ the > great wizard who did some of the illustrations in The Equinox, A. O. > Spare. If you did not encounter that name and work, you didn’t > understand anything. > > I adore such systems as I do Enochian Chess. There is nothing in them > to believe or reject. They are merely a challenge to mind. EXERCISE > EQUIPMENT. One explores them and avoids the pit trap. Even Crowley > warns of the pit trap. None of it is about any of the systems > presented. It is about studying such systems as an aid in developing > your own. My own is called Majik. It is Thelema based but with NONE of > the social element; and traditional rituals are replaced with planned > real world situations designed to challenge life, limb, and mind. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
