On Nov 15, 2:15 am, Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with your views on psychology (minus the straw man argument),
It is now looking like the straw-man might have been playing the part of a red herring. On Nov 15, 2:15 am, Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with your views on psychology (minus the straw man argument), > but I don't think cognitive psychology can at all be compared to > creationism or intelligent design. Remember that compared to other > sciences, psychology is relatively new. This would have to be the > stone age for you to compare cognitive psychology to "intelligent > design". > > Even with the recent medical breakthroughs of the past decade, > neuropsychology is still, literally, in the stone age. Don't get me > wrong. I'm going into neuropsychology myself and I can't wait for when > they prove that the "mind" and the "brain" are really the same thing, > but in the meantime there are many uses for applied cognitive > psychology. > > On Nov 13, 10:02 pm, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > B.F. Skinner ABA 1990 > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jtgkqB3DIA&feature=related > > > Parallel the arguments of cognitive psychologists (if you have some > > familiarity with cognitive psychology) with the arguments for > > intelligent design. > > > Take care, > > Jason- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
