The paper itself offered numerous viable solutions/alternatives to total doom and destruction. I'm happy it is out because it looks like a good paper and maybe more will show up like it to galvanize action if not terror. The reporter, histrionic messenger that he is, did us a favor by getting us to look at it. He should have used the summary at the end to show the path toward recovery...tsk tsk;)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <<and of course, scientific papers are less histrionic than most > other types of writing...It is convention>> > > It's also more accurate. The headline of the article you linked to > said "little hope of continuing life on Earth." That's crap and not a > mere layman's interpretation of the article. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Memphis Freethought Alliance" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
