pontification is addictive.


On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Clogtowner <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi y'all - if you are not prepared to discuss your articles, I'm not
> either.
>
> On Dec 23, 10:34 am, Morpheal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > STRANGLING ONE'S CUSTOMERS DOES NOT MAKE GOOD ALLIES:
> >
> > The end of GECF is definitely a positive note. It is long past time
> > for a more credible and less political organization of gas exporters,
> > with a more open. In the long term a sense of responsibility needs to
> > evolve in energy pricing that considers real costs of production and
> > sets prices based on those costs, ending natural resources being used
> > as an aggressive political weapon. Allies are won by means of a true
> > spirit of responsible community not by arm twisting and strangling to
> > death, in the manipulation of pipeline valves. We might hope that Mr.
> > Putin, the Russian Federation, and others, have learned that
> > strangling one's customers does not make for good allies in anything,
> > and that improved alliances, for mutual cooperation and progressive
> > purpose are more necessary for all sides in any bargain, than ever
> > before. We might hope for real progress, rather than arm twisting, and
> > valve twisting, manipulation, which is ultimately extremely counter
> > productive when it comes to all issues of human progress, in
> > solidarity as a world community with common goals and ideals.
> > Nevertheless, we can see how the traditional, more conservative,
> > American viewpoint, would favor Mr. Putin using strong arm tactics on
> > gas and oil valves to create and increase conditions of distrust, and
> > even enmity, blocking solidarity and cooperation. That divide and
> > conquer is very Americanist, and Mr. Putin would then be merely a pawn
> > in the traditional American game of American superpower politics. If
> > Mr. Putin is sufficiently the fool to continue with his valve twisting
> > strangling of his customers and potential friends, he surely will end
> > up wearing an American dunce cap on his head, as his most significant
> > reward for the sake of history.
> >
> > TINKERING WITH INFECTION RISKS TOTAL DEFEAT:
> >
> > The BBC said today: "Sir Richard Branson, who is vice-president of the
> > Patients Association, has accused politicians of "tinkering" with
> > infection control in hospitals."
> >
> > What will hospitals do to fight infection when eventually confronted
> > with bioterrorism or biological warfare ?  We live in the biotechnical
> > age where probability of that type of aggression increases every day.
> > If we cannot learn to defeat MRSA we cannot fight deliberate bio
> > attack. We must learn to defeat MRSA, treating it as a preparatory
> > defense drill, learning from the experience, how to fight more
> > dangerous foes. It will mean changed protocols and considerable
> > redesigning and re-engineering.
> >
> > We must recognize that the nuclear age ended around the turn of the
> > millenium. Those who are too backward looking and conservative still
> > dwell in the massive power of the nuclear explosion as their fixation
> > and obsession. In fact that threat is so diminished since as of the
> > culmination of the Cold War that it is very small in comparison to the
> > rapidly growing threat of biowar. The world has chosen to make
> > biotechnologies for genetic manipulation readily available to any, and
> > biotechnologies can, in theory, be utilized in any basement, in any
> > nation, anywhere in the world, to potentially produce new weapons of
> > mass destruction. There are no means for detecting the manufacture or
> > the "launch" of such weapons against their targets. There are limited,
> > if any, defenses, in almost all parts of the world, to detect an
> > attack, and the technologies for doing so, even though they do exist
> > in principle, have not been adequately developed and deployed to make
> > any real difference as the delivery systems of such invisible weapons
> > cross national borders. A basic knowledge of the spread of infectious
> > diseases, and of the inadequacies of our most advanced data bases and
> > early warning systems, should invoke a feeling of terror in anyone who
> > is even marginally knowledgeable. A feeling of terror far greater than
> > the terror of the mutually assured destruction, MAD, that was seen as
> > a real possibility between the USSR and the USA in the playing out of
> > Cold War mentalities.  Biowar is not limited to superpowers. It can be
> > utilized by any organized group, any nation, any extremist
> > organization.
> >
> > ENDING BLOOD AS THE CURRENCY TO PAY FOR PROGRESS:
> >
> > The BBC reports: "Lansana Conte, president of Guinea since 1984, died
> > last night. The army says it has taken control of the country, its
> > spokesman declaring that Guinea is in a state of 'deep despair', and
> > that the institutions of the Republic are incapable of resolving the
> > crises which confront the country."
> >
> > If the world community, is to end the belief, which gained prominence
> > in the 20th century, that blood spilling violent revolution is
> > necessary for progressive change in any oppressed nation, then we must
> > take action to liberate nations such as Guinea. Pressure must be
> > applied to bring about positive changes, facilitating human freedoms
> > and vital economic improvement. Otherwise the world community risks a
> > return to that false paradigm of bloodshed and civil chaos as being
> > definitive of progress.
> >
> > When nations such as Guinea are abandoned to resolve their own
> > difficulties, and abandoned to oppression under the gun, it leaves
> > them with no option but to prove and reaffirm eventual violent and
> > bloody uprising. People will not be forever chained, and oppressed, is
> > a fact that history has repeatedly affirmed. We know that fact. Then
> > why do we keep insisting, by means of our inadequate actions as a
> > world community, that the price of any progress in human lives, in
> > terms of establishing basic human freedoms and economic means for
> > maintaining and improving human lives, must always be paid using blood
> > as the currency ?  That must change. That paradigm must necessarily be
> > abandoned, in favor of more appropriate political means and
> > international political attention and intervention.
> >
> > Robert Morpheal
> >
> > This article maybe be copied, reproduced, distributed in any form, by
> > any means, anywhere by anyone and in fact anyone is encouraged to do
> > so.
> >
>


-- 
gnothe se auton

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to