Typing in URLs is less than before, but it won’t go away. And its much easier 
to remember a sites name in one’s native language and script. 

That’s why we are looking for ways to increase Arabic IDN adoption, while 
Russian and Korean IDN have been very successful commercially and in consumer 
uptake (see the reports Baher Esmat sent yesterday).

Regards
-Ahmed


From: Stephen Wilcox 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:25 PM
To: Ahmed Abu-Abed 
Cc: Timothy Roy ; mailto:[email protected] 
Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity

I mean there is less interest and value since navigation on the Internet has 
moved away from typing URLs into browsers.. app based devices and better search 
engines along with integration with browsers means most users are not 
remembering and typing URLs and instead using more seamless methods to 
navigate. 

Similarly with the "www" point which is also true with "http://"; - many years 
ago this was necessary as a lot of services other than www co-existing on the 
Internet and there was confusion with users, every day terminology and the 
expectation of the technology. Nowadays, if you type "apple" into your browser 
you will find your way immediately to Apple without needing the http, www or 
the .com ... in fact, if you use an iPad or iTunes you dont even need to know 
the URLs, its all built into the apps which are preloaded into the device.

eg enter "خليج" into your browser.. my first hit is "خليج - ويكيبيديا، الموسوعة 
الحرة" and my second is "خليج سيهات" etc ... but the websites are 
"http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/خليج‎"; and "http://www.khaleejsaihat.com/‎"; - 
both non-IDN, but if I only spoke arabic and didn't even understand the latin 
alphabet it wouldn't matter since the URL isn't important for me.

I'm not saying there shouldn't be IDNs or that having your company's name in 
arabic isn't important, just that users are not as focussed on the domain name 
any more therefore adoption is slower since priority is going elsewhere ie in 
content and apps.

Steve





On 28 October 2013 16:12, Ahmed Abu-Abed <[email protected]> wrote:

  Please elaborate on what is 10 years too late, do you mean IDN is late ?

  -Ahmed


  From: Stephen Wilcox 
  Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 2:53 PM
  To: Ahmed Abu-Abed 
  Cc: Timothy Roy ; mailto:[email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity


  Not wishing to sound skeptical, but isnt this all coming about 10 years too 
late and thats the reason for the lack of adoption?

  The device of choice is a smartphone or tablet, these are app and icon based.

  Being old fashioned I still use a computer but mostly find things, even 
common websites by inputting the common name into a search bar (or browser bar 
- Chrome doesnt distinguish) and the result is a clickable list of search 
results, which will be in the local script and language. 

  eg the average user never inputs urls anyway, but when they do they likely 
input arabic text directly to the browser for a search term and get a list of 
website titles and then click them. they dont pay attention to the underlying 
URL that much any more

  Compare to this address books on mobile phones. In the 90s I could tell you 
anyone's phone number from memory, now I know maybe my own and my Mums and 
thats about it..

  Steve






  On 28 October 2013 08:38, Ahmed Abu-Abed <[email protected]> wrote:

    The Arabic version of "net" would come at the beginning of the domain name, 
as we don't have an equivalent of "www". Thus in Oman's case it would still end 
in .oman in Arabic.

    IMO, as techies we may not be the best ones to judge which is better, ie. 
to keep an equivalent of www or drop it. The domain name's marketing staff 
should decide on this, with the aim of gaining more interest to their website 
if promoting an Arabic IDN. Registrar's may provide both options to their 
customers to encourage Arabic IDN adoption.


    Regards,
    -Ahmed


    On 2013-10-28, at 8:05 AM, Timothy Roy <[email protected]> wrote:


      I believe that the Arabic version of net would cause more confusion. I 
think that keeping simpler is better. I know that here in Oman we have been 
pushing and promoting the .oman(Arabic) IDN quite extensively. 



      I also believe that for an organization to actually have the Arabic 
content and URL they need to access their market. If they want to reach or 
promote their business to the MENOG regions (or regions of their specific 
country) that have a lesser comprehension of English language then they should 
go for it.  As a registry we are trying to promote it but it is mainly up to 
the Registrars to promote it to obtain more business in this field of domain 
names.



      My quick observations.



      Best Regards



      Timothy Roy

      Regulatory and Compliance Unit

      Domain Name Operations

      Telecommunications Regulatory Authority.

      Tel: +968 24574858

      Mobile: +968 93551117

      Email: [email protected]

      Office hours: Sunday – Thursday, 7:30am – 3:00pm (Muscat GMT +4)







      From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ahmed Abu-Abed
      Sent: 28 October 2013 08:55
      To: Fahd Batayneh
      Cc: menog@menog. net
      Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity



      I agree, the term “www” may seem redundant at first look, but it 
certainly indicates what is coming next is a web site. In other words, it is 
like a “Mr.” or “Dr.” title that give you a rough idea of the person you are 
referring to. 

      Should we have an Arabic “www” equivalent to grab peoples attention to 
Arabic IDN ? Something like نت  (translated into “net”) so instead of 
عمان.الاردن  the website owner should promote   نت.عمان..الاردن 



      This will likely get more attention to Arabic IDNs.



      My 0.02 Dinar thoughts ...



      -Ahmed





      From: Fahd Batayneh 

      Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 12:23 AM

      To: Ahmed Abu-Abed 

      Cc: mailto:[email protected] 

      Subject: RE: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity



      I have actually seen Arabic URLs posted in public areas in the UAE, yet 
it is not gaining the marketing advantages it seeks.



      There have been discussions within New gTLD applicants on whether to 
encourage New gTLD registrants (once these new gTLDs are delegated and are 
generally available) to advertise their online presence using “www” in front of 
the URL or not; i.e. www.menog.anything vs. menog.anything. For those who might 
not know, the inventor of the term “www” in front of URLs has admitted that 
such an addition was a mistake in the first place. Yet, after thorough 
discussions, those involved have concluded that in order for people to 
understand what menog.anything is, it is best that “www” is added in front of 
the URL for advertising purposes. I believe this to be the case for IDNs we 
well; i.e. some just don’t understand what مثال.اختبار is.



      My 2 cents.



      Fahd



      From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ahmed Abu-Abed
      Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:51 PM
      To: Tom Paseka
      Cc: menog@menog. net
      Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity



      Hi Tom,



      Country code TLDs have been available since 2010 for 4 Arab countries at 
least. Unfortunately its not on most peoples priority list for implementing, 
and I have not noticed any advertising for an Arabic URL over the past couple 
of years (I live in the MENOG region).



      As for CloudFlares IDNs, it would be good to filter out which are using 
the Arabic alphabet and know how many Arabic IDNs are actually out there. That 
would require a good understanding of Punycode used to translate an IDN into 
Latin characters.



      Regards,

      -Ahmed





      From: Tom Paseka 

      Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:20 PM

      To: Ahmed Abu-Abed 

      Cc: mailto:[email protected] 

      Subject: Re: [menog] New Arabic TLD and idea's popularity



      Hi Ahmed, 



      I've had a look through CloudFlare's customers and we see thousands of 
IDN's, but this is nothing compared to what exists in pre-existing romanized 
domains. 



      For a pre-existing company to move to a IDN, or any new domain in 
general, they have to revamp their presence, re-market to everyone to make sure 
they visit the correct address. I assume this isn't an easy task. 



      I suspect you'll see new starters coming out from the get-go with an IDN, 
but it'll take a while for the existing content to start adoption.



      Cheers,

      Tom



      On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed <[email protected]> wrote:

      ICANN is in the news with the new شبكة  TLD, see 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24637673



      I am yet to see Arabic TLDs widely implemented, although most browsers 
are ready, even on iOS and Android which I tested with an Arabic URL. Any idea 
on why is the delay in implementing Arabic URL by content providers 
(newspapers, etc.) ? People in the region prefer Arabic websites, so I am 
wondering what’s stopping content providers from having Arabic URLs.



      Also, anyone know if major portals, like Google or Yahoo, have 
implemented IDNs in any language for their URL ? Something like ياهو.شبكة  
(which translates to Yahoo.net , as I cannot find an equivalent to .com as an 
Arabic TLD).



      Best Regards,

      Ahmed Abu-Abed




      _______________________________________________
      Menog mailing list
      [email protected]
      http://lists.menog.org/mailman/listinfo/menog


    _______________________________________________
    Menog mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.menog.org/mailman/listinfo/menog






  -- 
  Director / Founder
  IX Reach Ltd
  E: [email protected]
  M: +44 7966 048633 
  Tempus Court, Bellfield Road, High Wycombe, HP13 5HA, UK.




-- 
Director / Founder
IX Reach Ltd
E: [email protected]
M: +44 7966 048633 
Tempus Court, Bellfield Road, High Wycombe, HP13 5HA, UK.
_______________________________________________
Menog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.menog.org/mailman/listinfo/menog

Reply via email to