I'd also prefer to keep the existing controller, view, and helper specs around. The new request specs sound great for functional testing, but I'd like to be able to still write unit tests for the various application layers.
-Mirko On Oct 29, 1:02 am, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:21 am, Yehuda Katz wrote: > > > As of RC1, the notion of "controller", "view" and "helper" specs are > > deprecated in favor of "request" specs, which test the responses for > > a given request. > > I'd like to vote in favour of these being maintained, even if they're > not the "recommended offical way" to write specs. > > There's a large contingency of BDDers who prefer to maintain > acceptance tests in another tool (Story Runner or Cucumber), and use > RSpec for lower level things, such as controllers and helpers. > Deprecating the isolated spec formats gives us two ways of solving one > problem and none of solving the other. > > Ashley > > --http://www.patchspace.co.uk/http://aviewfromafar.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
