Although it is nice to see merb making progress with things like run_later, for something as critical and common as email, it would be very nice to have a lightweight and robust daemon taking care of the job. Then we can use sendmail settings for merb-mailer and not worry.
Jon On Nov 10, 12:44 am, "Michael Klishin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/9 Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > What's the benefit of ar_mailer over run_later? > > -- Yehuda > > Run later does not block but you cannot do any sort of scheduling with it. > That's why merb-messenger in 1.1 would have a queuing functionality as > part of transports API. > > I don't know if ar_mailer really provides any advanced queuing > functionality, but there are use cases where run_later is not exactly > what is needed. > -- > MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
