We are working on redoing the entire rdoc template and filter public api methods. Sorry it takes so long.
-Matt On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Martin Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wasn't saying that the entire Merb code is undocumented, but rather that > http://www.merbivore.com/documentation.html didn't include an API for 1.0 > as of me writing that last email. > > That's obviously fixed now, even though it would be less confusing if 1.0 > was listed above 0.9.9 (since the 0.9.x versions are listed decreasing, you > naturally expect 1.0 to be listed above them). > > > On 12 nov 2008, at 23.14, Ryan Bigg (Radar) wrote: > > Awesome, another "omg no documentation" troll. > > Name the areas that require documentation so people feel more motivated to > do it rather than saying the entire Merb code is documentation-less. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
