My bad, thank you, I fixed that in the dependencies.rb file. However it does not change a lot. I installed the gem both into the merb app's gems folder (first) and then to the default gems repository. I always get the same thing:
FATAL: The gem merb_resource_controller (>= 0, runtime), [] was not found FATAL: The file merb_resource_controller was not found Do I have to require it somewhere else maybe? Balint On Dec 3, 6:50 pm, "Martin Gamsjaeger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Balint, > > The gem is named "merb_resource_controller" ! > > So you should have: > > dependency "merb_resource_controller" > > instead of: > > dependency "merb_resourceful_controller" > > Let me know if this solves all your issues! > > cheers > snusnu > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:15 PM, baaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey Martin, > > > That sounds great! I would love to give it a try but I could not > > figure out how to install a plugin for Merb. I guess from this post > > (http://blog.antarestrader.com/?p=70) that it might not happen so > > smoothly. Standing in the root directory of my Merb app I did: > > > gem install snusnu-merb_resource_controller -i ./gems/ > > > which installed your gem and all its dependencies into the 'gems' > > directory. I added the following line to dependencies.rb below all the > > others: > > > dependency "merb_resourceful_controller" > > > After that, when I started merb I received the following error: > > > FATAL: The gem merb_resourceful_controller (>= 0, runtime), [] was not > > found > > > (I tried the same with "snusnu-merb_resourceful_controller" to no > > avail.) > > > I also read Yehuda's guide (http://yehudakatz.com/2007/09/19/merb- > > plugins-oh-yeah-theyre-pretty-frickin-cool-too/) -somewhat old- about > > how to install a Merb-plugin and that seemed to be consistent with > > what I do but I am surely missing soemthing. > > > If that's an easy one, could you point me to what I am doing wrong? > > > Thanks a lot! > > Balint > > > On Dec 3, 2:34 am, "Martin Gamsjaeger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey Balint, > > >> Unless I misunderstand something > >> important,http://github.com/snusnu/merb_resource_controller/tree/mastermaywell > >> be an option? > > >> It basically knows how to CRUD under different nesting strategies > >> (i.e. /recommendations vs. /users/1/recommendations). > > >> It will always load your resource properly scoped (i.e. > >> Recommendation.all vs. @user.recommendations), without any before > >> filter abusing. > > >> It will also setup all the instance variables you would expect to find > >> for use in your views (i.e. @recommendations vs. @user AND > >> @recommendations) > > >> You would use it like so: > > >> class Application < Merb::Controller > >> extend Merb::ResourceController::Mixin::ClassMethods > >> end > > >> class Users < Application > >> controlling :users > >> end > > >> class Recommendations < Application > >> controlling :recommendations do |r| > >> r.belongs_to :user > >> end > >> end > > >> Maybe this helps? Let me know if anything doesn't work the way you > >> expect, if you try it out. Also don't be afraid to dive into the code, > >> read it (and the specs), fork it, throw it away, whatever ... It > >> currently does a nice job for me! Let's make it better by using it > >> more :-) > > >> That said, I'm all for Justin's suggestions to separate the > >> controllers when needed! If the only thing is avoiding nasty > >> conditionals for scoping queries and redirecting though, this may be a > >> reasonably easy alternative ... > > >> cheers > >> snusnu > > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Justin Reagor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:47 PM, baaz wrote: > > >> > Clearly, the data I should show in these two cases is different, so > >> > the controller code should handle this somehow. > >> > The "create" action in the controller is even messier, redirecting to > >> > different URLs depending on where we came from, etc. These dual-duty > >> > controllers will be bloated and not nice. > > >> > I think you nailed it on the head yourself, sounds like two different > >> > resources to me. Regardless of what the data model looks like on the back > >> > end, the exposed resources through the public API are probably going to > >> > need > >> > separate controllers. > >> > Unless I'm misinterpreting what your trying to achieve here. > >> > :: Justin Reagor > >> > :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
