interesting experiment. Whith this type of thing, the only way you know if it makes sense is to create enough variety of examples in real world code and see how well it all hangs together.
Please keep publishing your experiences on this. I may well be useful to others. thanks, Jon Piotr Sarnacki wrote: > Hi, > > I hate forms. I really do :) > > Forms are one of the most important things in applications, but they > are real pain most of the time. I always wanted to have some unified > form markup, easily styleable with nice look out of the box. > > I've created merb plugin which provides extended builder (it's on > github: http://github.com/drogus/merb-sexy-forms , but please don't > use it now - it's in development and it's my battlefield :). > > My target was to keep methods that I know and generate much more with > them. For example: > > = text_field :name, :label => "Name:", :required => true, :note => "A > note" > = check_box :active, :label => "Active:" > > The above code should generate inputs, wrappers and containers for > them, add required class (or html for required field) and note to text > field. > > It seems great for me. It's dry, it's unified, everyone in the project > can just use text_field and can forget about remembering the > structure, classes and stuff like that. And if I need to apply some > weird styles I could just change builder, not templates in gazillion > places. > > After actually using it in my project I've realized that it's good as > long as fields are relatively simple. > > Consider such a field: > > = text_field :name, :label => "Name:", :required => true, :class => > "short", :after => "Something", :note => "Some really long text, that > for sure will make this line <strong>longer</strong> than it should > be", :container => { :class => "container_class" } > > Long stinky hash. > > At this moment I can: > > 1. Consider this plugin useless and began to just write haml (and I > don't want it ;-) > > 2. Get rid of that stinky hash from view. > > It can be done in two ways. > > Move hash to helper - it's good for one field, creating helper for > every longer field call would be pain... > > Or.... pass a block to field: > = text_field :name do |c| > - c[:label] = "Name" > - c[:required] = true > .... etc. > > It's much better. > > But here comes the problem - > http://github.com/drogus/merb-sexy-forms/commit/57b7b079151b47a75ad373ef53df1c594daa8ee7#L1R22 > - the only way to make it work is to monkey patch some helpers. If you > have to use monkey patching in merb it's a bug, so I could just create > a ticket on lighthouse, but I don't know if I should :) It would not > change the API as &blk is optional, but still... > > Is it worth it? For me yes, but I probably can't look at it > objectively. What do you think about it? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
