On Dec 24, 2008, at 2:24 am, Rich Morin wrote: > In contrast, if the Merb is used as the starting point > and folks like Ezra and Yehuda get to vet any additions, > I could believe that the result would be quite sanitary. > That said, however, I defer to their judgement...
On Dec 24, 2008, at 3:03 am, Justin Reagor wrote: > Unless Rails 2 is trashed and completely replaced by Merb. In which > case, why does Rails get the title and tech just handed to it? > Because we need the logo rights? Rails 3 = Merb 2 + a transitional Rails compatibility layer, right? At least I hope that is the intention, or there will very soon be hundreds, if not thousands, of upset, disillusioned Merb developers around. Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://aviewfromafar.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
