I see that this patch did not make it into 1.0.6 nor 1.0.7. Any idea
why? As is, bound check_boxes and radio_buttons are essentially
broken.

..tony..

On Dec 17 2008, 7:11 pm, cult hero <[email protected]> wrote:
> I submitted the patch successfully:
>
> http://merb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/7433-merb/tickets/1138-patch-f...
>
> On Dec 17, 6:43 pm, cult hero <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I've figured out what's causing the problem with checkboxes. It
> > appears to be unrelated to the select and radio problems. (I'll look
> > into that later since I'm playing with the form stuff now anyway.) In
> > the meantime, here's the problem:
>
> > File: merb-helpers/lib/merb-helpers/form/builders.rb
>
> > def considered_true?(value)
> >   value && value != "0" && value != 0
> > end
>
> > I noticed considered_true? was returning true when it didn't seem like
> > it should. I checked the value of "value" being fed to
> > considered_true? by update_bound_check_box and it was "false" when it
> > should have been. So it appeared that considered_true?(false) was
> > returning true, which made no sense. However, looking further I got
> > this output:
>
> > value: false
> > value.class: String
> > value && value != "0" && value != 0: true
> > value != "0": true
> > value != 0: true
>
> > I presumed "value" was a boolean false. Turns out, it's a String with
> > the value "false."
>
> > So, one possible solution is:
>
> > def considered_true?(value)
> >   value && value != "false" && value != "0" && value != 0
> > end
>
> > This works fine for me. However, what I don't know is whether value,
> > which is retrieved from "val = control_value(method)" is supposed to
> > be "false" (String) or false (FalseClass). Looking at control_value it
> > appears to deliberately return a string. From what I can tell, the
> > above solution works though since considered_true? is only called
> > inside update_bound_check_box, so it wouldn't affect a text field with
> > the value "false" in any weird manner.
>
> > I've never submitted a patch before, but I found a guide on using git
> > and I'm going to try in just a few minutes. I'm pretty new to this
> > whole git thing!
>
> > On Dec 17, 8:41 am, cult hero <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I hope it's a bug. I'll feel better about my own skill level if it is!
>
> > > I try and limit the number of questions I ask around here in a day and
> > > I'd already hit my quota just before I noticed this problem last
> > > night. I'm hesitant to start filing any bug reports until I get some
> > > level of confirmation here or have a higher level of competence with
> > > Merb.
>
> > > On Dec 17, 12:14 am, "Yehuda Katz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > This potentially sounds like a bug. I'll try and take a look at it in 
> > > > the
> > > > morning when I get in to work. Someone else reported a similar issue 
> > > > with
> > > > radio_group to me this morning so I wonder if there's something I'm 
> > > > missing
> > > > here.
> > > > -- Yehuda
>
> > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:55 PM, cult hero <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > I started making my first forms today and things seem smooth except...
>
> > > > > The check_box field makes no sense to me at all. Here is the code it
> > > > > produces:
>
> > > > > <input type="hidden" class="hidden" name="person[is_active]" 
> > > > > value="0"/
> > > > > ><input type="checkbox" class="checkbox" name="person[is_active]"
> > > > > value="1" checked="checked" id="person_is_active"/><label
> > > > > for="person_is_active">Is name?: </label>
>
> > > > > That does make sense. The trouble is, no matter what the value of
> > > > > "is_active" is for @person, the box is ALWAYS checked. I even tried
> > > > > adding :boolean => @person.is_active to see if that would do it, but
> > > > > it's still checked. It works when the checkbox isn't bound to a model,
> > > > > but when it is I get this problem. To make sure I wasn't crazy I even
> > > > > have the value of @person.is_active display at the top of the form.
> > > > > True or false, the checkbox is always checked.
>
> > > > > Is this a bug or am I just missing something ridiculously simple?
>
> > > > --
> > > > Yehuda Katz
> > > > Developer | Engine Yard
> > > > (ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"merb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to