Luis Lavena wrote: > To our bad, afaik there is no ParseTree for 1.9.
I know this guy who has used Ripper to get complete lexes from raw Ruby source. It calls the same parser as Ruby itself, so it will definitely be maintained. (No RubyInline ramifications, either...) > I believe action-args should verify the version of Ruby in use and > check the VM Instructions or something along these lines. He also checks if RubyNode or Ripper are available and uses each one. Not exactly the same, but is Ripper closer to ParseTree than RubyNode was? That was essentially Ruby Assembler, after a bit of optimization... -- Phlip --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
