&: is a bit of a spasticated form. Would also be nicer if it allowed multiples ie chaining
Sent from my iPhone On 03/02/2009, at 6:50 AM, Michael Klishin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 02.02.2009, at 22:22, Phlip wrote: > >> The point was that making &: an operator would let the efficiency >> start at parse >> time... > > > 1.8.7 has it implemented in C, and it looks like it does not change > much > > MK > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
