thanks Pavel, I'll have another go at trying to figure out why my current app isn't working in the 1.1.0.pre gem release but is working well in the 1.1.0.pre I built in December. I was only asking about 1.9.2 to think about options for getting out of this mess.
~Jon On Mar 19, 8:26 am, Pavel Kunc <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm running as well on 1.9.1 + 1.1.0.rc1. I tired to run my app on > 1.9.2 and there were no problems I can remember. However 1.9.2 being > just a preview can have quite a few bugs. I wouldn't run it in > production. > > Once 1.9.2 is out (at least rc) we will make sure Merb runs smoothly > there. > > BTW by "string model" you mean Encoding stuff? > > Pavel > > On Mar 19, 6:47 am, Jon Hancock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone using ruby 1.9.2 on merb1.1.0.rc1? > > I'm using 1.9.1 on merb 1.1.0.pre (built from git in December). > > I've been having trouble upgrading to the 1.1.0.pre gem release as > > discussed in a previous thread. > > > Are their clear benefits to going to 1.9.2? What kind of things would > > I need to worry about (besides of course checking my dependent gems > > work)? My app was built with 1.9.1 in mind so I'm using the 1.9 > > string model heavily. Any change there with 1.9.2? > > > thanks, Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en.
