Nope, just that what they choose to show is not the happy helpers that
are doing work, but the horrific destruction. Both are true, one gets
more airtime and thus tells a less balanced story. This morning we get
the stories of people who did get off their duff and with what little
was available before outside help arrived had set up solutions. No
more blood and tears to shoot, so lets do the happy stories
On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, at 06:00 AM, andrew strasfogel wrote:
Then by your logic, since the media focusses on the pain, death,
destruciton, and suffering more than focussing on the overwhelming
number of survivors, then this proves that the "crisis" is a creation
of the liberal media out to get Bush!
On 9/4/05, redghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It could also be the speed and views of the media on the ground. We
hit the ground sort of running in Indonesia, and the happy media people
tell stories of what great good we get done along with the tear stories
so that the do gooders look gooder.
Media is on the scene, balance shifts to showing what is not getting
done, instead of the do gooder stories. A little bias goes a long way
On Saturday, September 3, 2005, at 04:06 PM, Hans Neureiter wrote:
> Not confirmed, but, how else could it be.
> He died last night from laughing so hard over what the U S A is doing
> right now.
> The LEADER, POLICE and SAVIOR of the free world fails where third
> world countries succeeded: help thy neighbour in dire need.
> I remember the big wave that hit Indonesia last year - we were there
> next day.
> Now it happens in our back yard.
> We watch it on the news and feel sorry for the low lives who should
be
> held responsible fortheir neglect to heed warnings, butdemand"help
> me!", shitin the halls and rapeand loot.
> Isama laughed him self to death, I am crying.
--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner
1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz
