On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:10:49 -0400 (EDT) Luther Gulseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically here it is. The hardware needed is very expensive. For every > mile (or so-give or take a few hundred feet) there is an expensive > repeater needed. This is very practical in the city, where you can have > hundreds of subscribers in 1 mile of wire, try that in rural areas, you > might have 0.25 subscribers in 1 mile of wire. That's where the > impracticality of BPL lies. Stick with wireless or satellite for you > country folk! In addition, there is tremendous potential for high-frequency radio services, including amateur radio. Someone had a web page link once upon a time. Craig
