That's abysmal. The 86 delta 88 with 3.8 v6 and automatic never turned a road trip tank less than 28 mpg. No question that it was WAY more powerful than the diesel would have been. I'll take the milage hit for the driveability difference, thanks.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:45:54PM -0500, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: > This is the FWD with the V6 diesel. Same body as like the Olds 88 > Regency etc. I know the Olds in that body had the "talking" feature, > not sure if the caddy does. As far as GM cars of the 80's go, I like > that body, they do ride pretty good. Was just checking the fuel mileage > online and its supposed to get 32 with the diesel. Not bad. _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
